I fuckin' love this song and this band!

5/13/2007 No Talking Heads Topics (work in progress . . .)
(guests will be TJ Johnson, Jacqui Brown-Miller, Meta Hogan, Geov Parrish)

Local
Downtown Safeway to Close in June
Oly City Council Cuts School Impact Fees to Encourage Downtown Development
Tumwater Investigates Making Old Brewery a Regional Historical Tourist Attraction
Camp Quixote Use of OUUC Space Ends on May 19th
Estimate for port dredging skyrockets to $6.2 million; Increased cost could lead to higher taxes ( . . .higher taxes! Over my dead body!)

Regional
3 US Attorneys Speak at Seattle U; AG Gonzalez Testifies Again (so what?)
(Weird . . .) Dead fawn, dressed like baby, left outside Tacoma theater

National
Michael Moore Investigated
NYTimes: Colleagues Cite Partisan Focus by Justice Official
A pivotal hearing on case of Abu-Jamal
Police intimidate Mumia supporters as May 17 court date looms by Hans Bennett
- can tie into Jacqui's story, "Three US Newspapers Reverse 100-Year-Old Stand on Death Penalty" from the Inter-Press Service.

International

McKay, Iglesias, Charleton

I attended a forum today on the firing of 8 US attorneys (referred to as USAs in the handouts) at Seattle University (organized by my dad) and it was really informative.

One professor started by giving a historical background of the office and how an act in the 1700s created the positions of USA. Then, how the Justice Dept was created in the 1800s.

Another professor described the role of the office and some of the tensions that exist when some USA adhere to central control of the office vs more local autonomy.

The 2nd session had the three former USA, U.S. Attorneys Paul K. Charlton (District of Arizona); David Iglesias (District of New Mexico); and John McKay (Western District of Washington, now Visiting Faculty, Seattle University School of Law).

A woman in front of me was live blogging to an About.com website about US Politics - I think she got her headline the most right ("McKay: Time For Special Prosecutor"), especially since McKay was squarely asked if a special prosecutor should investigate the firings and his answer was an unequivocal "Yes!".

Good job dad - I'm especially proud of you!

Mother's Day for Peace

Just a reminder, I'll be debuting my new public affairs program tonight on KAOS at 5pm - "No Talking Heads" - hope you can listen in. (I'm still not crazy about the name, so I'd consider a new name for the show if the right one hit me.)

And, you can tune in every Sunday night at 5pm for the same.

I'll be reviewing the weeks news tonight with Olympia City Councilman TJ Johnson, Olyblog founder Rick McKinnon and co-editor of Eat the State, Geov Parrish. (links of interest below)

We want your phone calls as well - the number to call is 360-867-5267 - so call in if you have any news you'd like to discuss or share.

http://kaos.evergreen.edu/listenlive.html

or tune into 89.3FM if you're in the South Sound.

TTYL,

Howard Rosenfeld

http://hrstruggle.blogspot.com/

http://www.beyondhiroshima.org/

http://olyblog.net/

http://eatthestate.org/

I just added the ability to leave comments . . . seems like such a simple thing. Don't know why it just occurred to me.

Oh well.

Hey, my new radio show, "No Talking Heads", starts this Sunday night, April 29th at 5pm on KAOS in Olympia. It's on 89.3 FM or hit the KAOS link for the web stream. Hope you can listen and call in!

Shopping with a Conscience

We should have had this the last year I co-chaired the UU Social Justice Committee . . . doh!

Rosie ODonnell is certainly not backing away from her public stance about 9/11, and this morning on The View went on a 9 minute rant about the many questions surrounding the attack, reaching around 30 million viewers in the process.

read more | digg story

Tired of the game? Left already? Here is a site where people post their reasons for leaving the game.

I need this . . .

read more | digg story

I'm sitting at Batdorf & Bronson's in downtown Olympia - it's so nice. I can work on my laptop, take calls on my cell phone, drink excellent LOCAL coffee. I've totally arrived. I'm not commuting in to Tacoma any longer - THANK THE LORD JESUS.

I had to post because I swear to god I've seen the same guy walk past the shop like 6 times now. And he's always walking in the same direction. I think he's just walking around the block multiple times. I hope he's just trying to get some exercise. It was weird enough to post. I'd take a picture of him with my cell phone but I don't know how to get the pictures off of my phone. Well, OK, I'm too cheap to pay for it really.

An Inconvenient Truth Squeezed from Classrooms

An Inconvenient Truth Squeezed from Classrooms

The producers of An Inconvenient Truth have offered to supply American classrooms with 50,000 copies of the movie free of charge. That offer has been rejected by the National Science Teachers Association (NSTA), the nation's leading science education teachers group, citing a risk to funding from key financial supporters.

One of those supporters is Exxon-Mobil.

I finished building a fence yesterday - pretty damn proud of it. OK, it's only 14-feet long and 3-feet high - but it looks DAMN GOOD!!

I have to spray it now with a protective seal, so it won't turn grey and rot in one year. Let's see how fast that happens . . .

My Top Albums of 2005

Peasall Sisters - Home to You
Kronos Quartet & Asha Bohsle - You've Stolen My Heart
Bob Dylan - Bootleg Series, V.7 - Soundtrack to Film
Iron & Wine & Calexico - In the Reins
Wilco - Kicking Television
Nada Surf - The Weight is a Gift
Harvey Danger - Little by Little
Gogol Bordello - Gypsy Punks
The New Pornographers -Twin Cinema
Fruit Bats - Spelled in Bones
Denison Witmer - Are You A Dreamer?
Frank Black - Honeycomb
Son Volt - Okemah & the Melody of Riot
Sufjan Stevens - Illinois
Clap Your Hands Say Yeah - S/T
The White Stripes - Get Behind Me Satan
The Great Lakes Myth Society - S/T
Decemberists - Picaresque
Bettie Serveert - attagirl
The Chris Stamey Experience - A Question of Temperature

Adrienne Young & Little Sadie - The Art of Virtue
Rachel Ries - For You Only

Been a LONG time since last post . . . I rarely feel like doing it . . . and then I look at my blog every once in a while and go . . . geez, I should really post more . . . endless cycle.

Bought a house 7/15/2005; sold a house at the end of August.

New house is getting more familiar - it's slightly tilting, we're realizing - some photos here.

Zoë turned three!! We had a fabulous cow-themed birthday party (her idea) at Burfoot Park in Olympia at the Forest Shelter - lots of friends came; things were grilled; beer was plentiful; cow pinata would not break open - until I practically stomped on it and another mom ripped it apart. But that was fun too!

Zoë is also practically potty-trained - YIPPEE!! She still wears a pull-up at night but that's OK - I still wear one on occassion. ; )

House projects are never-ending. Currently have two workers under hire; one to install dishwasher; other to remodel bathrooms. Heather is scheming to get windows replaced since it's been getting cold recently, we're noticing how badly they keep the cold air out. Makes for cozy, cuddling, keeping warm at night sleeping!

Getting basement room in order last night was fun - felt like we accomplished quite a bit. More later . . .

Now, THIS makes me totally bummed . . . I mean, it actually got me to post SOMETHING (I like the headline here - "Game over!!").

No, really, I could care less. However, I do remember the fond days of attending Washington Capital games at the Capital Centre in Landover, MD when I was a kid. The thing I remember most was eating a sandwich my mother made me at one game in particular and realizing it had mustard on it - and she knows I HATE mustard. She was giggling at me while I starved . . . no just kidding mom (maybe that was a Bullets game? . . .)

OK, Jerky seems to have scooped me. I give.

Great story on the bulge in Bush's jacket at Salon or here:

"NASA photo analyst: Bush wore a device during debate
Physicist says imaging techniques prove the president's bulge was not caused by wrinkled clothing.

- - - - - - - - - - - -
By Kevin Berger

Oct. 29, 2004 | George W. Bush tried to laugh off the bulge. "I don't know what that is," he said on "Good Morning America" on Wednesday, referring to the infamous protrusion beneath his jacket during the presidential debates. "I'm embarrassed to say it's a poorly tailored shirt."

Dr. Robert M. Nelson, however, was not laughing. He knew the president was not telling the truth. And Nelson is neither conspiracy theorist nor midnight blogger. He's a senior research scientist for NASA and for Caltech's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and an international authority on image analysis. Currently he's engrossed in analyzing digital photos of Saturn's moon Titan, determining its shape, whether it contains craters or canyons.

For the past week, while at home, using his own computers, and off the clock at Caltech and NASA, Nelson has been analyzing images of the president's back during the debates. A professional physicist and photo analyst for more than 30 years, he speaks earnestly and thoughtfully about his subject. "I am willing to stake my scientific reputation to the statement that Bush was wearing something under his jacket during the debate," he says. "This is not about a bad suit. And there's no way the bulge can be described as a wrinkled shirt."

Nelson and a scientific colleague produced the photos from a videotape, recorded by the colleague, who has chosen to remain anonymous, of the first debate. The images provide the most vivid details yet of the bulge beneath the president's suit. Amateurs have certainly had their turn at examining the bulge, but no professional with a résumé as impressive as Nelson's has ventured into public with an informed opinion. In fact, no one to date has enhanced photos of Bush's jacket to this degree of precision, and revealed what appears to be some kind of mechanical device with a wire snaking up the president's shoulder toward his neck and down his back to his waist.

Nelson stresses that he's not certain what lies beneath the president's jacket. He offers, though, "that it could be some type of electronic device -- it's consistent with the appearance of an electronic device worn in that manner." The image of lines coursing up and down the president's back, Nelson adds, is "consistent with a wire or a tube."

Nelson used the computer software program Photoshop to enhance the texture in Bush's jacket. The process in no way alters the image but sharpens its edges and accents the creases and wrinkles. You've seen the process performed a hundred times on "CSI": pixelated images are magnified to reveal a clear definition of their shape.

Bruce Hapke, professor emeritus of planetary science in the department of geology and planetary science at the University of Pittsburgh, reviewed the Bush images employed by Nelson, whom he calls "a very highly respected scientist in his field." Hapke says Nelson's process of analyzing the images are the "exact same methods we use to analyze images taken by spacecraft of planetary surfaces. It does not introduce any artifacts into the picture in any way."

How can Nelson be certain there's some kind of mechanical device beneath Bush's jacket? It's all about light and shadows, he says. The angles at which the light in the studio hit Bush's jacket expose contours that fit no one's picture of human anatomy and wrinkled shirts. And Nelson compared the images to anatomy texts. He also experimented with wrinkling shirts in various configurations, wore them under his jacket under his bathroom light, and couldn't produce anything close to the Bush bulge.

In the enhanced photo of the first debate, Nelson says, look at the horizontal white line in middle of the president's back. You'll see a shadow. "That's telling me there's definitely a bulge," he says. "In fact, it's how we measure the depths of the craters on the moon or on Mars. We look at the angle of the light and the length of shadow they leave. In this case, that's clearly a crater that's under the horizontal line -- it's clearly a rim of a bulge protruding upward, one due to forces pushing it up from beneath."

Hapke, too, agrees that the bulge is neither anatomy nor a wrinkled shirt. "I would think it's very hard to avoid the conclusion that there's something underneath his jacket," he says. "It would certainly be consistent with some kind of radio receiver and a wire."

Nelson admits that he's a Democrat and plans to vote for John Kerry. But he takes umbrage at being accused of partisanship. "Everyone wants to think my colleague and I are just a bunch of dope-crazed ravaged Democrats who are looking to insult the president at the last minute," he says. "And that's not what this is about. This is scientific analysis. If the bulge were on Bill Clinton's back and he was lying about it, I'd have to say the same thing."

"Look, he says, "I'm putting myself at risk for exposing this. But this is too important. It's not about my reputation. If they force me into an early retirement, it'll be worth it if the public knows about this. It's outrageous statements that I read that the president is wearing nothing under there. There's clearly something there."

- - - - - - - - - - - -

About the writer
Kevin Berger is a senior news editor at Salon."

Or see the photo here.

Predicting the Electoral College Results via Polling

A few interesting website have been incorporating the latest polling information to predict who will win the Presidency.

1). Current Electoral Vote Predictor 2004 - this is pretty interesting - it has Kerry leading at the moment but no clear winner (no one at 270 electoral college votes).
2). Los Angeles Times Interactive Electoral College Turnout - this site is neat because it lets you change the results in all 50 states to see how the race would turn out under different circumstances. You control the outcome! And then it plays the Presidental theme song or convocation that they play when the President is inaugurated when either Bush or Kerry's total reaches 270.

Of course, over dinner last night, a bunch of friends and myself were saying that all the polling is really bunk because they are not taking into account a). the surge in voter registration all over the country and b). the heavy use of cell phones as a person's single point of contact. None of these cell-phone only folks ever get included in polls, so how accurate can they be?